Preview

Mongolian Studies

Advanced search

Tibetan Buddhism in the Works of Chinese Researchers of the 1st Quarter of 21st Century (Based on the Materials of Scientific Online Library Wanfang Data)

https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2025-4-763-778

Abstract

Introduction. Tibetan Buddhism is the object of research for Russian and foreign scientists. The works of Russian scientists are written on the wide range of topics in Tibetan Buddhism. Thereby the special focus is on the works of Chinese researchers on the topic of Tibetan Buddhism as long as it is been thought out of accord with ideological principles in China. The relevance of the study is to be the first attempt of the analysis of Chinese works about Tibetan Buddhism in the context of study of transformations in socio-political processes. The main aim of the work is the material analysis of the online database Wanfang Data on the topic of Tibetan Buddhism. The objectives are: to show the degree of the study in Russian and foreign historiography, to analyze the works of Chinese researchers, to identify the directions of research of Tibetan-Mongolian Buddhism which is conducted by Chinese scientists. Materials of this study are publications in the Chinese online database Wanfang Data.  Results. Through the analysis of the materials such areas of the research as the relations of state and the representatives of Tibetan Buddhism, the study of history and philosophy of Tibetan Buddhism, its influence in Mongolia and ARIM, were identified. Along with that the role of Utaishan mountain for the representatives of Tibetan Buddhism and its relations with Chinese Buddhism was under of large focus.

About the Author

Viktoriia E. Tsyrempilova
Dorzhi Banzarov Buryat State University, (24a, Smolin St., 670000 Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation)
Россия


References

1. Andreev A. I. Tibet in the Policy of Tsar, Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University, Nartang, 2006. 465 p. (In Russ.).

2. Androsov V. P. The Founder of Mahayana Nagarjuna and his works. In 2 vols. M.: Institute of Oriental Studies (RAS), Nauka, Vostochnaya Literatura. 2018. Vol. 1. 663 p. Vol. 2. 638 p.(In Russ.).

3. Androsov V. P. The Founder of Mahayana Nagarjuna and his works. In 2 vols. M.: Institute of Oriental Studies (RAS), Nauka, Vostochnaya Literatura. 2018. Vol. 1. 663 p. Vol. 2. 638 p.(In Russ.).

4. Ayusheeva D. V. Tibetan Buddhism and other Confessions // Buddhism in Sociocultural and Political Processes of Russia, Inner and Eastern Asia: transformations and perspectives. Ulan-Ude: Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibe­tan Studies (SB RAS), 2016. Pp. 400–407. (In Russ.).

5. Bogoslovsky V. P. Tibetan Region of the CPR (1949–1976). M.: Nauka, 1978. 200 p. (In Russ.)

6. Bazarov A. A. Buddhist Systematic Text as an Example of Absolute Dictate of Lo­gic. Humanitarian Vector. 2012. No. 3(31). Pp. 22–29. (In Russ.).

7. Vanchikova Ts. P. Buddhism in Mongolia: History, Clergy, Churches. Irkutsk: Ottisk, 2019. 292 p. (In Russ.)

8. Garri I. R. Buddhism and politics in the Tibet region of the People’s Republic of China (2nd half of the 20th century – beginning of the 21st century). Ulan-Ude: Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibe­tan Studies (SB RAS), 2009. 320 p. (In Russ.).

9. Gerasimova K. M. Lamaism and National-colonial Policy of the Tsarism in Transbaikalia in 19th and beg. of 21st Centuries. Ulan-Ude: Buryat-Mongol. Scientific Research Institute of Culture, 1957. 160 p. (In Russ.)

10. Gerasimova K. M. Renovation’s Movement of Buryat Lamaist Clergy (1917–1930). Ulan-Ude: Buryatia Book Publ., 1964. 179 p. (In Russ.)

11. Zhukovskaya N. L. Lamaism and Early Years Forms of Religion M.: Nauka, 1977. 199 p. (In Russ.)

12. Zorin A.V. On the Structure and Content of the Collection “Sungdui” // Tibetology in Saint-Petersburg. St. Petersburg: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie, 2014. Pp. 100–118. (In Russ.).

13. Krapivina R.N. Buddhist Tradition of Tantras in Tibet / transl. from Tibetan, preface, introd., glossary by R. N. Krapivina. St. Petersburg: Nestor-History, 2020. 384 p. (In Russ.).

14. Kuz’min S.L. Theocratic nationalism and Buddhist Church of Mongolia in the Beginning of 20th Century. M.: Partnership of Scientific Works KMK, 2016. 496 p. (In Russ.)

15. Sabirov R.T. Mongolian Buddhism in 21st: in the pProcess of Structuring. State, Religion, Church in Russia and Abroad. 2020. Vol. 38. No. 1. Pp. 86–105. (In Russ.)

16. Tsyrempilov N.V. Buddhism and Empire. The Buryat Buddhist community in Russia (18th – early 20th Centuries). Ulan-Ude: Buryad-Mongol Nom, 2013. 338 p. (In Russ.).

17. Yangutov L. E. Unity, Identity and Harmony in the Philosophy of Chinese Buddhism. Novosibirsk: Nauka, Siberian Publishing Firm of the RAS, 1995. 224 p. (In Russ.).

18. Bai Wengu. The Prohibition and Rectification of the Tibetan Buddhism in Qing Dynasty. Zhongguo Zangxue. 2005. Vol. 3. Pp. 169–175. (In Chin.)

19. Bai Yan. Contemporary Analysis of the Policy of Dynasties Qing and Yuan towards Tibetan Buddhism. Xizang Yanjiu. 2004. Vol. 1. Pp. 39–43. (In Chin.)

20. Bai Yan. Policy of Tibetan Buddhism and its Tradition in the Dynasties Yuan, Ming and Qing. Lanzhou: Northwest University for Nationalities, 2005. (In Chin.)

21. Banmagengzhu. About Factors of Central Dynasty in the Process of Sinification of Tibetan Buddhism. Zhongguo Zangxue. 2024. Vol. 1. Pp. 22–31. (In Chin.)

22. Chen Nan. Researches of Historical Facts of Invasion of Tibetan Buddhism into Mongolia and Establishment of Relations. Gudai Wenming. 2008. Vol. 4. Pp. 92–99. (In Chin.)

23. Chen Wei, E Chongrong. Experience and Practical Study of the Party’s Policy in the Regulation of Tibetan Buddhism since the Formation of the PRC. Social Science Journal of Quinghai Normal University. 2019. Vol. 4. Pp. 1–7. (In Chin.)

24. Cierdeji. Assistance of Sinification of Tibetan Buddhism in the New Epoch. Bulletin of Tibetology. 2020. Vol. 1. Pp. 81–86. (In Chin.)

25. Cui Yin. Study of Interrelation of Emperors of Qing Dynasty in the Early Stages of Tibetan Buddhism. Qingzang gaoyuan luntan. 2019. Vol. 3. Pp. 29–34. (In Chin.)

26. Du Juan, Liu Daping, Li Jia. Mixing and Coexistence: Analysis of Variety of Buddhist Architecture on the Territory of Mongolia. Xinjianzhu. 2019. Vol. 6. Pp. 89–93. (In Chin.)

27. Du Juan, Liu Daping, Liu Chun. New Cultural and Geographical Interpretation of Tibetan Buddhism on the Territory of Mongolia. Jianzhu Xuebao. 2020. Vol. 7. Pp. 99–104. (In Chin.)

28. Duan Jingjing. Mount Wutai and Sacral Place of the Tibetan Buddhism. Xizang Daxue Xuebao. 2008. Vol. 1. Pp. 75–78. (In Chin.)

29. Gong Xuening. The Study of Temple Wudangzhao (Gelugpa) on the Territory of ARIM. Xian: Xian Jianzhu Keji Daxue, 2003. 86 p. (In Chin.)

30. Kan Benjia, Zhaxizhuoma. Retrospective Study of Tibetan Buddhism from the Beginning of the Policy of Reforms and Openness (based on the materials of periodicals in Tibetan). Zongjiaoxue Yanjiu. 2019. Vol. 4. Pp. 171–173. (In Chin.)

31. Li Xiaoguang. Governing along with Local Customs and Combining Kindness and Authority: on the Construction of the Tibetan Buddhism during the Qing Dynasty. Zongjiaoxue Yanjiu. 2001. Vol. 4. Pp. 112–117. (In Chin.)

32. Li Lin. Study of Pictures of Tibetan Buddhism. Beijing: Zhongyang Meishu Xueyuan, 2002. 154 p. (In Chin.)

33. Li Decheng. Development of Sinification of Modern Tibetan Buddhism. Zhongguo Zangxue. 2024. Vol. 1. Pp. 1–10. (In Chin.)

34. Liu Bintao. Laws and Features of the Qing Dynasty towards Tibetan Buddhism. Xibu Xuekan. 2019. Vol. 23. Pp. 47–51. (In Chin.)

35. Liu Peng. Thoughts about Development of Tibetan Buddhism into Direction of Sinification. Sichuansheng Shehuizhuyi Xueyuan Xuebao. 2019. Vol. 1. Pp. 48–51. (In Chin.)

36. Lu Xuanli. Analysis of Expansion of Tibetan Buddhism on the Mountain Wetaishan during the Yuan Dynasty. Heihe Xueyuan Xuebao. 2016. Vol. 6. Pp. 211–213. (In Chin.)

37. Shen Guiping. Historical Study of Adaptation of Tibetan Buddhism to Socialistic Society. Zhongyang Shehui Zhuyi Xueyuan Xuebao. 2008. Vol. 6. Pp. 74–77. (In Chin.)

38. Song Shaoliang. Study of System of Certi­ficate of Ordination for Tibetan Monks during the Period of Qing Dynasty. Lhasa: Xizang Daxue, 2014. 73 p. (In Chin.)

39. Sun Wuhu. Sinification of Tibetan Buddhism and Contemporary Situation. Qinghai Minzu Yanjiu. 2019. Vol. 2. Pp. 10–15 (In Chin.)

40. Tang Jisi. The Influence of the Tibetan Buddhism on Folk Religion in Mongolia. Xibei Minzu Xueyuan Xuebao. 2002. Vol. 4. Pp. 94–101. (In Chin.)

41. Wang Kaidui. Study of History of Mongolian Buddhism from the New Point of View — Commentary to the Article “Expansion of Tibetan Buddhism during Ming and Qing Dynasties. Huh-Hoto: Neimenggu Shehui Kexue, 2008. (In Chin.)

42. Wang Chuan. Expansion of Tibetan Buddhism in the Country during the Republic of China. Xinan Minzu Daxue Xuebao (renwen shehui kexuebao). 2008. Vol. 6. Pp. 34–40. (In Chin.)

43. Wang Xiaoying. Study on the Cultural and Ideological Reasons for the Introduction of the Tibetan Buddhism into Mongolia. Qinghai Shehui Kexue. 2005. Vol. 2. Pp. 133–136. (In Chin.)

44. Wang Sisi. Sinification of Tibetan Buddhism: Esthetic Similarity of Chinese and Tibe­tan Temple’s Architecture. Qinghai Minzu Daxue Xuebao (shehui kexueban). 2023. Vol. 2. Pp. 138–145. (In Chin.)

45. Yin Haiyan. Development and Transformation of Policy by Ming Dynasty towards Tibetan Buddhism. Xizang Yanjiu. 2019. Vol. 3. Pp. 58–69. (In Chin.)

46. Yin Hang. Study of Expansion of Tibetan Buddhism in the Epoch of Ming Dynasty. Beijing: Zhongyang Minzu Daxue, 2011. 109 p. (In Chin.)

47. Zhao Gaiping. Brief Analysis of Features of Tibetan Buddhism on the Wutaishan Mountain. Wutaishan Yanjiu. 2004. Vol. 3. Pp. 11–15. (In Chin.)

48. Zhao Suizhen. Difference in Policies of Dynasties Ming and Qing. Xiandai Qiye Wenhua. 2008. Vol. 23. Pp. 124–125. (In Chin.)

49. Zhu Lixia. Analysis and Comparison of Tibe­tan Buddhist Thoughts about Judgements. Xizang Yanjiu. 2005. Vol. 1. Pp. 20–24. (In Chin.)

50. Zong Ruibin. Tibetan Buddhism and Calli­graphy. Xizang Yishu Yanjiu. 2001. Vol. 1. Pp. 48–55. (In Chin.)


Review

For citations:


Tsyrempilova V. Tibetan Buddhism in the Works of Chinese Researchers of the 1st Quarter of 21st Century (Based on the Materials of Scientific Online Library Wanfang Data). Mongolian Studies. 2025;17(4):763-778. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2025-4-763-778

Views: 21

JATS XML

ISSN 2500-1523 (Print)
ISSN 2712-8059 (Online)