Syntagmatics of Adjectives Denoting a Geometrical Shape of an Object (evidence from the Kalmyk National Corpus)
Abstract
The article considers the syntagmatics of adjectives denoting geometrical shapes of objects with evidence from Kalmyk National Corpus; the adjectives are the ones that denote planar figures, physical bodies, properties and characteristics of the figures and bodies. The adjectives are largely loan words and have not been introduced into Kalmyk bilingual dictionaries which signifies that those are not that significant for language speakers in their daily communications. Most of the adjectives denoting geometrical shapes of objects combine with words that denote parts of the body. Some of the adjectives (khurts ‘sharp’, gho ‘straight’, mat’khr ‘curved mind’, dörvljn ‘square’) can be used to characterize attitudinal cognitive processes.
About the Authors
N. MulaevaRussian Federation
Ph.D. in Philology (Candidate of Philological Sciences), Research Associate, Department of Linguistics
S. Bachaeva
Russian Federation
Ph.D. in Philology (Candidate of Philological Sciences), Research Associate, Department of Linguistics
References
1. Arakin V. D. About Lexical Compatibility. In: To the Lexical Compatibility Problem. Moscow: Nauka, 1972. Pp. 3–12. (In Russ.)
2. Auzyak G. T. Semantic Combinability of Adjectives with Nouns in Modern German. Science Time. 2015. No. 1 (13). Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/semanticheskaya-sochetaemost-prilagatelnyh-s-suschestvitelnymi-v-sovremennom-nemetskom-yazyke (accessed: 5 September 2016). (In Russ.)
3. Bachaeva S. E. Lexical Compatibility of Adjectives Denoting the Size and Magnitude (on the Material of Songs of the Epos “Dzhangar” and the National Corpus of the Kalmyk Language). In: Actual Problems of Modern Mongolian Study. Elista: Kalmyk Institute of Humanitarian Research of the RAS, 2015. Pp. 103‒115. (In Russ.)
4. Bachaeva S. E. The Combination of Adjectives Indicating the Large Size of the Spatial Extent (on the Material of the Kalmyk Language). In: Humanities of the South of Russia: International and Regional Interaction. Conf. proc., devoted to the 75th anniversary of Kalmyk Institute of Humanitarian Research of the RAS (Elista, 14–15 September 2016). Elista: Kalmyk Institute of Humanitarian Research of the RAS, 2016. Pp. 182–183. (In Russ.)
5. Gilyarova K. A. Linguistic Conceptualization of the Form of Physical Objects. Cand. Sc. thesis (philology). Мoscow, 2002. 198 p. (In Russ.)
6. Kalmyk–Russian Dictionary. B. D. Muniev (ed.). Moscow: Russkiy yazyk, 1977. 768 p. (In Kalm. and Russ.)
7. Makhova A. A., Lyashevskaya O. N., Desyatova A. V. Body Parts from the Point of View of Topology: Corpus Research. In: Computer Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies. Conf. proc. (Bekasovo, 27–31 May 2009). Is. 8 (15). Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities, 2009. Pp. 313–320. (In Russ.)
8. Mulaeva N. M. Syntagmatics of adjectives tөgrg ‘round’, utulң ‘oval’. In: Humanities of South of Russia: International and Regional Interaction. Conf. proc., devoted to the 75th anniversary of Kalmyk Institute of Humanitarian Research of the RAS (Elista, 14–15 September 2016). Elista: Kalmyk Institute of Humanitarian Research of the RAS, 2016. Pp. 207–209. (In Russ.)
9. Nikolenko Yu. V. Types of Estimates Expressed by Means of the Adjectives Indicating the Geometrical Form of the Object. Problems of Cognitive Linguistics. 2011. No. 3. Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tipy-otsenok-vyrazhaemyh-s-pomoschyu-imen-prilagatelnyh-oboznachayuschih-geometricheskuyu-formu-obekta (accessed: 10 October 2016). (In Russ.)
10. Pavlov D. N. Cognitive Strategies for Denoting the Form of Objects in Russian and English. Cand. Sc. thesis (philology) abstract. Orel, 2007. 24 p. (In Russ.)
11. Rakhilina E. V. Cognitive Analysis of Subject Names: Semantics and Compatibility. Moscow: Russkie slovari, 2000. 415 p. (In Russ.)
12. Rakhilina E. V. Cognitive Analysis of Subject Names: Semantics and Combinability. Moscow: Russkie slovari, 2008. 416 p. (In Russ.)
13. Russian–Kalmyk Dictionary. I. K. Ilishkin (ed.). Moscow: Sov. encyclopedia, 1964. 803 p. (In Russ. and Kalm.)
14. Talmy L. How language structures space. In: Spatial orientation: theory, research, and application. H. Pick, L. Acredolo (eds.). N. Y.: Plenum, 1983. P. 225–282. (In Eng.)
15. The National Corpus of the Kalmyk Language. Available at: http://kalmcorpora.ru/ (accessed: 17 November 2016). (In Kalm.)
16. Vlavatskaya M. V. Combinatorial Linguistics: Theoretical and Methodological Bases of Origin and Development. Scientific Dialogue. 2012. No. 3. Available at: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kombinatornaya-lingvistika-teoretiko-metodologicheskie-osnovy-zarozhdeniya-i-razvitiya (accessed: 10 October 2016). (In Russ.)
17. Vlavatskaya M. V. Theoretical Problems of Combinatorial Linguistics. Lexicology. Lexicography. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Technical University, 2011. 508 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Mulaeva N., Bachaeva S. Syntagmatics of Adjectives Denoting a Geometrical Shape of an Object (evidence from the Kalmyk National Corpus). Mongolian Studies. 2016;8(2):186-195. (In Russ.)