Syntagmatics of the Adjectives Ӧnder ‘Tall’and Gün ‘Deep’
Abstract
With evidence from the Kalmyk National Corpus, the article explores the syntagmatics of the adjectives ӧnder ‘tall’ and gün ‘deep’. The adjectives ӧnder and gün are semantically close but measurements of an object are performed differently. Ӧnder collocates with words denoting vertical stems (pillars), stretched objects, stilts and, unlike gün, cannot collocate with nouns characterizing substances (snow, water), permanent containers: one can say gün tӓrlk ‘deep plate’ but one cannot say ӧnder tӓrlk ‘high plate’; gün tsasn ‘deep snow’ but not ӧnder tsasn ‘high snow’.
About the Authors
S. BachaevaRussian Federation
Ph.D. in Philology (Candidate of Philological Sciences), Research Associate, Department of Linguistics
N. Mulaeva
Russian Federation
Ph.D. in Philology (Candidate of Philological Sciences), Research Associate, Department of Linguistics
References
1. The National Corpus of the Kalmyk Language. Available at: http://kalmcorpora.ru/ (accessed: 15 November 2016). (In Kalm.)
2. Bachaeva S. E. Lexical Compatibility of Adjective Indicating the Size and Magnitude (on the Material of Songs of the Epos “Dzhangar” and the National Corpus of the Kalmyk Language). In: Actual Problems of Modern Mongolian Study. Elista: Kalmyk Institute of Humanitarian Research of the RAS, 2015. Pp. 103‒115. (In Russ.)
3. Bachaeva S. E. Combinability of Adjectives Denoting the Large Size of Spatial Extent (on the Material of the Kalmyk Language). In: Humanities of the South of Russia: International and Regional Interaction. Conf. proc., devoted to the 75th anniversary of Kalmyk Institute of Humanitarian Research of the RAS (Elista, 14–15 September 2016). Elista: Kalmyk Institute of Humanitarian Research of the RAS, 2016. Pp. 182‒183. (In Russ.)
4. Kukanova V. V. The Explanatory Dictionary of the Language of Kalmyk Heroic Epos “Dzhangar”: Principles and Problems of Completing Dictionary Entries. In: “Dzhangar” and Epic Traditions of Turkic-Mongolian Peoples: Problems of Preservation and Research. Conf. proc., dedicated to the 75th anniversary of Kalmyk Institute of Humanitarian Research of the RAS (Elista, 15–16 September 2016). Elista: Kalmyk Institute of Humanitarian Research of the RAS, 2016. Pp. 7–12. (In Russ.)
5. Mulaeva N. M. Syntagmatics of Adjectives tөgrg ‘round’, utulң ‘oval’. In: Humanities of the South of Russia: International and Regional Interaction. Conf. proc., devoted to the 75th anniversary of Kalmyk Institute of Humanitarian Research of the RAS (Elista, 14–15 September 2016). Elista: Kalmyk Institute of Humanitarian Research of the RAS, 2016. Pp. 207‒209. (In Russ.)
6. Rakhilina E. V. Cognitive Analysis of Subject Names: Semantics and Compatibility. Moscow: Russkie slovari, 2008. 416 p. (In Russ.)
7. Rakhilina E. V. Cognitive Analysis of Subject Names: Semantics and Combinability. 2nd ed. Moscow: Azbukovnik, 2010. 448 p. (In Russ.)
8. Semenova S. Yu. Concerning some Properties of Names of Spatial Parameters. In: Logical Analysis of Language. Languages of Spaces. Moscow: Logos, 2000. Pp. 115‒125. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Bachaeva S., Mulaeva N. Syntagmatics of the Adjectives Ӧnder ‘Tall’and Gün ‘Deep’. Mongolian Studies. 2016;8(2):70-77. (In Russ.)