Catholic Physician for Kalmyk Khan: Characterizing Imperial Russia’s Religious Policy in Its Southern Peripheries, Early 1760s

Introduction. The article concentrates on the religious policy of the Russian Empire in the Early Modern Time. For the first time in historiography, a study was carried out concerning the activities of Catholic missionaries in relation to the Kalmyk Khanate, the attempts of the Capuchin Order to establish contacts with the Kalmyk Khan Donduk-Dashi. Materials and methods. The study is based on mostly unpublished materials from the political and diplomatic correspondence of the Collegium of Foreign Affairs and the legislation of the first half of the 1760s, characterizing the methods and territorial scope of the missionaries activity, in particular, their penetration into the Kalmyk steppe. The methodology of the study has been determined by the structural and functional approach to the system of state bodies of Russia. In combination with this approach, a historical-genetic method was used, which is optimal for the study of changes in the power system of the Russian Empire from the beginning of the 18th century through the first half of the 1760s. Results. The section demonstrates the reasons for the aspiration of the Capuchin Order to the North Caucasus and the place of the Kalmyk Khanate in missionary plans, describes the standard epoch-specific missionary techniques for influencing the non-Catholic population. It has been determined that the Capuchins, relying on the support of Austrian diplomacy, bypassed the formal restrictions on missionary activity in the studied region, which could not but cause religious friction. The activity of Russian institutions to resolve differences of this kind is traced, the difficulties encountered by the authorities in the capital and especially at the local level in connection with the need for an appropriate settlement are shown. At the same time, it is emphasized that the specific interests of secular and spiritual bodies in such cases did not coincide, which had a long-standing and stable character in the south. The dynamics of the attitude of the Russian authorities towards missionaries in the Russian south is outlined. If under the conditions of the “Austrian system” — orientation towards the Austrian court, which had been in Russian diplomacy since the times of Peter the Great and under Empress Elizaveta Petrovna, their position was favorable, then after the accession of Catherine II and the crisis in Russian-Austrian relations, the possibilities of missionaries in the North Caucasus and the Kalmyk steppes were significantly limited. The author states that in the process of settling religious tensions, the Russian authorities in the early 1760s faced a weak legal framework both in relation to non-Orthodox religions and in general. The solution to the problem was outlined with the accession of Catherine II and in connection with the empress’s policy in the spheres of religion and law.

1. Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire.

2. Bliev M. M. (comp.) Russian-Ossetian Relations, 18th Century: Collected Documents. In 2 vols. Vol. 2: 1764–1784. Ordzhonikidze: Ir, 1984. 439 p. (In Russ.)

3. First Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire. St. Petersburg: His Own Imperial Majesty’s Chancellery (Second Section), 1830. Vol. 16: 28 June 1762 to 1764. 1018 p. (In Russ.)

4. Ambartsumov I. V. The Armenian-Catholic issue in the Russian Empire in early 20th century. Christian Reading. 2012. No. 4. Pp. 84–105. (In Russ.)

5. Andreev A. N. Russian ‘non-Russians’ in 18 century and West Christianity influence. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series ‘Social Sciences and the Humanities’. 2010. Vol. 15. No. 28 (204). Pp. 6–11. (In Russ.)

6. Andreev A. N. The priesthood of Roman Catholic church in the ‘Greek township’ of St. Petersburg. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series ‘Social Sciences and the Humanities’. 2014. Vol. 14. No. 4. Pp. 6–14. (In Russ.)

7. Beltramini E. Roman Catholic government and mission to Tibet: a historical and theological study. International Bulletin of Mission Research. 2021. Vol. 45. No. 1. Pp. 68–72. (In Russ.)

8. Cholakyan A. Syrian Catholics of Armenian descent. 21-y vek: Informatsionno-analiticheskiy zhurnal. 2012. No. 2 (22). Pp. 53–68. (In Russ.)

9. Dzhundzhuzov S. V., Lyubichankovsky S. V. The missionary activity of Nicodemus Lenkeevich in the Kalmyk Khanate (1725–1734). The New Historical Bulletin. 2017. No. 3 (53). Pp. 172–191. (In Russ.)

10. Kalchenko A., Ven. History of origin and development of Catholic monastical missions in Russia. In: Transactions of Belgorod Theological Seminary. Collected scholarly papers. Vol. 7. Belgorod: LitKaraVan, 2018. Pp. 154–162. (In Russ.)

11. Kidirniyazov D. S., Lysenko Yu. M. Ossetian Theological Committee in the North Caucasus, 18th to mid-19th centuries. Voprosy Istorii. 2015. No. 3. Pp. 163–169. (In Russ.)

12. Kuznetsov N. D. Administering foreign faiths in Russia: a historical perspective. Vremennik Demidovskogo yuridicheskogo litseya. 1898. Vol. 75. Pp. 65–104. (In Russ.)

13. Mackiewicz W. (OFM Conv) History of Catholic Church in Astrakhan Lands. Astrakhan: Novaya Liniya, 2012. 245 p. (In Russ.)

14. Maksimov A. S. From ethnocentrism to inculturation. Culture and civilization in the history of catholic mission. St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series I: Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies. 2015. No. 5 (61). Pp. 9–26. (In Russ.)

15. Ryazhev A. S. Grand Duchess Catherine and the Catholic missionaries in Southern Russia: the future Empress in search of paths to power (the second half of the 1750s). The New Historical Bulletin. 2020. No. 2. Pp. 6–22. (In Russ.)

16. Ryazhev A. S. Religious policy of Russian ‘enlightened absolutism’: history of exploration reviewed. In: Sakharov A. N. (ed.) History and Historians 2005: A Historiographical Bulletin. Moscow: Nauka, 2006. Pp. 84–126. (In Russ.)

17. Ryazhev A. S. Unpublished documents on sending of a Christened captive to the Khan of Baku: an insight into correspondence between Holy Synod and Board of Foreign Affairs, 1777. Magna adsurguit: historia studiorum. 2017. No. 1. Pp. 32–40. (In Russ.)

18. Savvinsky I., Ven. Armenians in Astrakhan Eparchy, and Attitudes of Local Bishops towards Them, 18th Century. Astrakhan: V. L. Egorov, 1900. [2], 106 p. (In Russ.)

19. Savvinsky I., Ven. Astrakhan Eparchy over the 300 Years of Its Existence: A Historical Note, 1602 to 1902. Astrakhan: V. L. Egorov, 1903. 403, [2] p. (In Russ.)

20. Savvinsky I., Ven. Catholics and Lutherans in Astrakhan Eparchy, and Attitudes of the Holy Synod and Local Eparchial Officials towards Them. Astrakhan: V. L. Egorov, 1902. 61 p. (In Russ.)

21. Tolstoy D. A. Roman Catholicism in Russia: A Historical Study by Count Dmitry A. Tolstoy. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: V. F. Demakov, 1876. VIII, 538 p. (In Russ.)

22. Yangel T. Ya., Oglezneva G. V. Proselytism motives of interfaith relations in Russia in the second half of the XIX century. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series ‘Political Science and Religious Studies’. 2016. Vol. 18. Pp. 204–211. (In Russ.)