Preview

Mongolian Studies

Advanced search

Nartan Kangyur as an Object of Archaeological Research and Cult Practice in Buryatia

https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2026-1-113-124

Abstract

Introduction. The article is devoted to the study of the Narthang edition of Kangyur from the collection of the Tibetan fund of the Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of SB RAS presented there in one complete and three incomplete versions. The relevance of the study is concerned with the need to represent the Buddhist canon not only as a source contains the essence and richness of Buddhism but also as a sacral object of religious veneration and possessing true significance in the constructing and functioning in the spiritual space of various societies. The aim of this work is to introduce the collection of Narthang Kangyurs from Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of SB RAS into scientific circulation and to describe its structure. Conclusions. The editions of the Nartan Kangyur kept in the Tibetan collection from the Institute for Buddhist, Mongolian and Tibetan studies represent a unique source for various studies primarily in the fields of historical, source-study and archaeographic directions. An analysis of historical and archaeographic datasets revealed that the Narthang Kangyur occupies an important and a unique position among the other woodcut editions of the Buddhist canon, demonstrating its particular significance for the everyday religious culture of Buryat Buddhists. The predominance of Narthang editions of the Buddhist canon allows them to be characterized as the most significant not only in terms of quantity but also in terms of their impact on the religious space of Buryatia.

About the Authors

Andrey A. Bazarov
Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the RAS (6, Sakhyanova St., 670047 Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Dr. Sc. (Philosophy.), Leading Research Associate 



Soelma R. Batomunkueva
Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the RAS (6, Sakhyanova St, 670047 Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (Philosophy), Research Associate



References

1. Bazarov A.A. Collection of Oriental Books of the Zabaikalsky Krai Museum of Local Lore In: Scientific Notes of the Trans-Baikal State Humanitarian-Pe­dagogical University. 2013. Vol. 2(49). Pp. 107–111. (In Russ.)

2. Buddhism in the History and Culture of the Buryats Collective Monograph; I. Harry (ed.). Ulan-Ude: Buryaad-Mongol Nom, 2014. 418 p. (In Russ.)

3. Vostrikov A. I. Tibetan Historical Literature. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, 1962. 428 p. (In Russ.)

4. Dandaron B. D., Semichov B. V. Tibetan Collection of our Institute. Brief Communications of the Buryat Complex Scientific Research Institute. No. 2. Ulan-Ude: Printing House of the Ministry of Culture of the Buryat ASSR, 1960. Pp. 131–134. (In Russ.)

5. Zorin A. V., Mitruev B. L., Sabrukova S. S., Sizova A. A. The Catalogue of Texts of the Tibetan Buddhist Canon Kept at the Institute of Oriental Manuscripts, RAS. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Centre for Oriental Studies Publishers, 2017. 509 p. (In Russ.)

6. Myagmarsuren Gombodorzhijn. Ganzhuuryn Garchig. Ulaanbaatar: Bembisan hevlel ujldver, 2023. 47 p. (In Mong.)

7. Namnanov D. D. Chesansky Datsan: History and Modernity. V. Nomogoeva (ed.). Ulan-Ude: Publishing House of the Buryat State University, 2018. 312 p. (In Russ.)

8. Nacov G.-D. Materials on Lamaism in Buryatia. Part 2. G. Galdanova (pref., trans., notes, glossary). Ulan-Ude: BSC of SB RAS Publishing House, 1998. 187 p. (In Russ.)

9. Syrtypova S. D. Sacred Sites and Shrines of the Transbaikal Nomads (Traditional Religious Sites as Historical and Cultural Monuments). Ulan-Ude: Publishing House of the Buryat State University, 2007. 269 p. (In Russ.)

10. Syrtypova S. D., Garmaeva H. Zh., Bazarov A. A. Buddhist Printing of Buryatia in the 18th – 20th Centuries. Ulaanbaatar: Admon, 2006. 222 p. (In Russ.)

11. Eimer H. Some Results on Recent Kanjur Research. Bonn: Wissenschaftsverlag, 1983. 21 p. (In Eng.)

12. Eimer H. A Note on the History of the Tibetan Kanjur. Central Asiatic Journal. Vol. 32. No. 1/2. 1988. Pp. 64–72. (In Eng.)

13. Harrison P. A Brief history of the Tibetan bka’ ‘gyur // Tibetan Literature: Studies in Genre. J. Cabezón and R. Jackson (eds). Ithaca: Snow Lion, 1996. Pp. 70–94. (In Eng.)

14. Moallem A. J. Polhane Sonam Tobgye, Treasury of Lives, 2022. Available at: https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/pho-lha-nas-bsod-nams-stobs---rgyas/5805 (accessed: 28 August 2025).

15. Petech L. China and Tibet in the Early 18th Century: History of the Establishment of Chinese Protectorate in Tibet. Leiden: Brill, 1950. 286 p. (In Eng.)

16. Stanley D. Ph. The Tibetan Buddhist Canon, Copyright, 2005. Available at: https://www.thlib.org/encyclopedias/literary/canons/index.php#!essay (accessed: 24 April 2024).

17. Tucci G. Tibetan Notes. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. Vol. 12. No. 3/4. 1949. Pp. 477–496. (In Eng.)


Review

For citations:


Bazarov A.A., Batomunkueva S.R. Nartan Kangyur as an Object of Archaeological Research and Cult Practice in Buryatia. Mongolian Studies. 2026;18(1):113-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2026-1-113-124

Views: 47

JATS XML

ISSN 2500-1523 (Print)
ISSN 2712-8059 (Online)