The Spatial Concept ‘Proximity’: Linguistic Expressive Means in Mongolic Languages Reviewed
https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2022-4-800-813
Abstract
Introduction. The article deals with key lexical and morphological means of expressing the spatial concept of proximity in Mongolic languages. Such lexical means include adjectives, adverbs and verbs, while morphological ones are case forms and postpositions. Goals. The study aims to describe key linguistic means of expressing the concept of proximity in Mongolic languages. Materials. The work analyzes Mongolic dictionary entries and texts contained in national corpora of the examined languages. Results. The analysis shows there are multi-level linguistic means of expressing the concept ‘proximity’, all lexical and morphological tools being presented in static and dynamic locative situations. Adjectives in attributive constructs, spatial adverbs, verbs that initially comprise some spatial semantics are widely used to express the meaning of being, moving nearby, or approaching. For example, the meaning of staying near a certain object can be conveyed by static localization verbs, while the direction of movement towards the object, approaching a landmark can be conveyed by dynamic localization verbs. The grammatical expressive means traced are case forms and postpositions which are also used in various types of contexts (location, orientation towards a landmark, movement in a neutral direction). Semantics of postpositions, in contrast to case forms, is certain enough. Postpositions with the meaning ‘proximity’ cluster together to form the most numerous group in Mongolic languages. Conclusions. The conducted analysis attests to a variety of expressive means pertaining to the concept ‘proximity’ and reveals peculiarities of their use in related Mongolic languages. The examined language expressive means are of significant interest for semantic typology at large.
About the Authors
Liudmila A. LidzhievaRussian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Philology), Associate Professor
Roza P. Kharchevnikova
Russian Federation
Dr. Sc. (Philology), Professor
Bolha A. Shurungova
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Philology), Associate Professor
Mingiyan A. Lidzhiev
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Philology), Associate Professor
Naran Yu. Mandeev
Russian Federation
BA Student
References
1. Buryat National Corpus. Available at: http://web-corpora.net/BuryatCorpus (accessed: 15 October 2022). (In Bur.)
2. Kalmyk National Corpus. Available at: http://web-corpora.net/KalmykCorpus (accessed: 15 October 2022). (In Kalm.)
3. Khabunova E. E. (comp.) The Son of Bear: Folktales of Eurasia. Elista: Kalmyk State University, 2017. 199 p. (In Russ.)
4. Kozin S. A. The Secret History of the Mongols: A 1240 Mongolian Chronicle Titled Mongɣol‑un niɣuca tobciyan, Or Yuáncháo Mìshǐ. Vol. I. Moscow; Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences, 1941. 620 p. (In Russ.)
5. Mongolian National Corpus. Available at: http://web-corpora.net/MongolianCorpus (accessed: 15 October 2022). (In Mong.)
6. Muniev B. D. (ed.) Kalmyk-Russian Dictionary. Moscow: Russkiy Yazyk, 1977. 768 p. (In Kalm. and Russ.)
7. Pyurbeev G. Ts. (ed.) Unabridged Academic Mongolian-Russian Dictionary. In 4 vols. Vol. 1: A–Г. Moscow: Academia, 2001. 520 p. (In Mong. and Russ.)
8. Pyurbeev G. Ts. (ed.) Unabridged Academic Mongolian-Russian Dictionary. In 4 vols. Vol. 2: Д–O. Moscow: Academia, 2001. 536 p. (In Mong. and Russ.)
9. Pyurbeev G. Ts. (ed.) Unabridged Academic Mongolian-Russian Dictionary. In 4 vols. Vol. 4: Х–Я. Moscow: Academia, 2002. 532 p. (In Mong. and Russ.)
10. Shagdarov L. D., Cheremisov K. M. Buryat-Russian Dictionary. In 2 vols. Vol. 1: A–Н. Ulan-Ude: Respublikanskaya Tipografiya, 2010. 636 p. (In Bur. and Russ.)
11. Shagdarov L. D., Cheremisov K. M. Buryat-Russian Dictionary. In 2 vols. Vol. 2: О–Я. Ulan-Ude: Respublikanskaya Tipografiya, 2010. 708 p. (In Bur. and Russ.)
12. Todaeva B. Kh. Dictionary of Xinjiang Oirat. Elista: Kalmykia Book Publ., 2001. 493 p. (In Oir., Kalm. and Russ.)
13. Bardamova E. A. Space and Time in the Buryat Linguistic Worldview. Dr. Sc. (philology) thesis. Ulan-Ude, 2012. 402 p. (In Russ.)
14. Boguslavskaya O. Yu. Dynamics and statics in semantics of spatial adjectives. In: Logical Analysis of Language. Languages of Space. Moscow: Yazyki Russkoy Kultury, 2000. Pp. 20–29. (In Russ.)
15. Cheremisin A. N. Adjectives of Spatial Semantics as a Means to Express Evaluation in Modern English. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Tambov, 2015. 23 p. (In Russ.)
16. Chugunekova A. N. Category of Space in Khakass: A Comparative Typological Aspect. Dr. Sc. (philology) thesis. Abakan, 2016. 345 p. (In Russ.)
17. Dodueva A. T. Category of Space and Its Representation in Karachay-Balkar. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Nalchik, 2008. 42 p. (In Russ.)
18. Esbaeva R. Kh. Russian Prepositional-Declensional Constructs with Spatial Semantics: Kazakh Equivalents [Analyzed]. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Alma-Ata, 1979. 25 p. (In Russ.)
19. Gak V. G. Space beyond space. In: Logical Analysis of Language. Languages of Space. Moscow: Yazyki Russkoy Kultury, 2000. Pp. 127–134. (In Russ.)
20. Gashilova L. B. Expressing Spatial Orientation in Nivkh: Locative Cases and Postpositions [Analyzed]. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Leningrad, 1985. 17 p. (In Russ.)
21. Imanalieva R. B. Exploring Kazakh Expressive Means of Spatial Semantics: Ethnolinguistic Aspects [Analyzed]. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Alma-Ata, 1989. 24 p. (In Russ.)
22. Ismailov K. A. Semantic Analysis of English Spatial Adjectives: A Perspective from Karakalpak Language Materials. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Moscow, 1979. 19 p. (In Russ.)
23. Kibrik A. E. Attempting a typology of spatial meanings: Declensional systems of Dagestani languages analyzed. In: Language and Man. Moscow: Moscow State University, 1970. Pp. 110–156. (In Russ.)
24. Kosareva E. O. Frequency of deictic local adverbs in everyday speech. Perm University Herald. Russian and Foreign Philology. 2016. No. 1(33). Pp. 14–20. (In Russ.)
25. Lidzhieva L. A., Ubushieva B. E., Lidzhiev M. A. Semantic features of deictic spatial adverbs in Mongolian languages. Bulletin of Kalmyk University. 2021. No. 4(52). Pp. 81–86. (In Russ.)
26. Nevskaya I. A. Spatial Relations in Turkic Languages of Southern Siberia: Shor Language Materials Analyzed. Novosibirsk: Nika, 2005. 305 p. (In Russ.)
27. Nevskaya I. A. Typology of Locative Constructs in Turkic Languages of Southern Siberia: Shor Language Materials Analyzed. Dr. Sc. (philology) thesis. Novosibirsk, 1997. 198 p. (In Russ.)
28. Pankov F. I., Markova N. S. The semantic system of locative adverbs in the Russian language: Linguistic and didactic aspects. Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2019. No. 194. Pp. 170–183. (In Russ.)
29. Payar D., Seliverstova O. N. (eds.) Studies in Prepositional Semantics. Moscow: Russkie Slovari, 2000. 376 p. (In Russ.)
30. Perfilyeva T. G. Expressing Temporal and Spatial Relations in Nenets. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Novosibirsk, 1974. 24 p. (In Russ.)
31. Plungyan V. A. (ed.) Studies in the Theory of Grammar. Vol. 2: Grammaticalization of Spatial Meanings in Languages of the World. Moscow: Russkie Slovari, 2002. 340 p. (In Russ.)
32. Rassadin V. I., Trofimova S. M., Shagdarsuren Ts., Bold L., Davaasuren B. Kalmyk (Russia) and Oirat (Mongolia): Historical Ties Revealed. Elista: Kalmyk State University, 2010. 182 p. (In Russ.)
33. Sagaan N. Ya. Spatial Relations in Tuvan: The System of Expressive Means [Analyzed]. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Novosibirsk, 1998. 21 p. (In Russ.)
34. Sagynbayev K. French Spatial Prepositions and Their Kyrgyz Analogues. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Frunze, 1989. 23 p. (In Russ.)
35. Seliverstova O. N. The [Russian] preposition на: Semantic structure revisited. In: Studies in Prepositional Semantics. Moscow: Russkie Slovari, 2000. Pp. 189–242. (In Russ.)
36. Shilova V. V. Spatial Models of Elementary Simple Sentences in Nenets. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University, 2003. Part 1. 106 p. (In Russ.)
37. Shilova V. V. Spatial Models of Elementary Simple Sentences in Nenets. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University, 2003. Part 2. 184 p. (In Russ.)
38. Shmatova N. V. Semantics of the Spatial Prepositions в and на in Russian and Scandinavian Languages: A Typological Description. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Moscow, 2011. 28 p. (In Russ.)
39. Sycheva V. V. Conceptualization of Distance-Related Characteristics ‘Close’ / ‘Far’ in English. Cand. Sc. (philology) thesis abstract. Voronezh, 2012. 23 p. (In Russ.)
40. Vsevolodova M. B., Vladimirsky E. Yu. Modern Russian: Spatial Relations and Linguistic Expressive Means. Moscow: Russkiy Yazyk, 1982. 140 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Lidzhieva L.A., Kharchevnikova R.P., Shurungova B.A., Lidzhiev M.A., Mandeev N.Yu. The Spatial Concept ‘Proximity’: Linguistic Expressive Means in Mongolic Languages Reviewed. Mongolian Studies. 2022;14(4):800-813. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2022-4-800-813