Co-occurrence of the adjective ut ‘long’ (evidence from the kalmyk national corpus)
Abstract
Since the development of software that serves the needs of the Kalmyk National Corpus has made it possible to apply digital research methods for the purposes of Kalmyk vocabulary studies, the systematic description of adjectives in the Kalmyk language is thus a new issue.
The article examines the lexical co-occurrence of the adjective ut ‘long’ which means a long length and characterizes flat pulled and flexible cord-like surfaces, antonymous to the word akhr ‘short’; it also contains a typological classification table of the adjective ut in Kalmyk with two groups of objects identified as well as the types of the objects.
When combined with the words that characterize human speech and time lines, the adjective ut has a figurative meaning ‘of long continuance’, i.e. there is a transference of the meaning from space to time: ut tuuj ‘long stories’, ut soe ‘long night’, ut oedr ‘long day’, ut dun ‘lingering song’.
The adjective ut mostly co-occurs with nouns that denote parts of the body, flexible objects, infinite spaces; rarely co-occurs with words that denote deepenings on a surface, apertures and coreless pulled objects. Rarely if ever one can see the combination ut nyukn ‘long pit’, in most cases they say gyun nyukn ‘deep pit’. The considered combinations of the adjective ut can serve as the basis for further detailed research on the co-occurrence of adjectives.
About the Author
S. BachaevaRussian Federation
Ph.D. in Philology (Candidate of Philological Sciences), Research Associate, Department of Linguistics
References
1. Bachaeva S. E. Lexical co-occurrence of adjectives denoting big size and spatial extent: A case study of Kalmyk vocabulary. In: Humanities in South Russia — International and Interregional Cooperation. Jubilee conference proceedings (Elista, 14–15 September 2016). Elista: Kalmyk Humanities Research Institute (RAS), 2016. Pp. 182–183. (In Russ.)
2. Bachaeva S. E. Lexical co-occurrence of adjectives denoting size and magnitude: A case study of Jangar epic narratives and the Kalmyk National Corpus. In: Topical Questions of Contemporary Mongolian Studies. Elista: Kalmyk Humanities Research Institute (RAS), 2015. Pp. 103‒115. (In Russ.)
3. Getmantsev S. M. Specific Collocational features of Russian and English adjectives denoting spatial measurements. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2014. No. 2. Pp. 88–90. (In Russ.)
4. Kukanova V. V. National Corpora of the Kalmyk Language: Results and prospects. The New Research of Tuva. 2015. No. 1. Available at: http://www.tuva.asia/journal/issue_25/7760-kukanova.html (accessed: 30 October 2016). (In Russ.)
5. Kuzina I. Yu. Parametrical adjectives: Peculiarities of semantic co-occurrence revisited. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. 2008. No. 544. Pp. 98‒108. (In Russ.)
6. Morkovkin V. V. Collocational properties of word and their systematic lexicographic interpretation. In: Issues of Lexical Co-Occurrence. Collected scholarly papers. Vol. 145. Moscow: Maurice Thorez Moscow State Institute of Foreign Languages, 1979. Pp. 129–138. (In Russ.)
7. Mulaeva N. M. Syntagmatics of the adjectives төгрг ‘round’, утулң ‘oval’. In: Humanities in South Russia — International and Interregional Cooperation. Jubilee conference proceedings (Elista, 14–15 September 2016). Elista: Kalmyk Humanities Research Institute (RAS), 2016. Pp. 207–209. (In Russ.)
8. Rakhilina E. V. Names of Objects and Their Cognitive Analysis: Semantics and Co-Occurrence. Moscow: Russkie Slovari, 2008. 416 p. (In Russ.)
9. Talmy L. How language structures space. In: Pick H., Acredolo L. (eds.) Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application. New York: Plenum, 1983. Pp. 225–282. (In Eng.)
Review
For citations:
Bachaeva S. Co-occurrence of the adjective ut ‘long’ (evidence from the kalmyk national corpus). Mongolian Studies. 2016;8(1):148-157. (In Russ.)