Preview

Mongolian Studies

Advanced search

Photo Images of Buryatia’s Buddhists

https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2020-4-824-833

Abstract

Goals. The paper examines the issue of visual images in the everyday ritual practice of ordinary Buddhists in Buryatia. The relevance of studying rare Buddhist photographs as a historical and cultural source cannot be questioned, since this perspective reveals unknown aspects in the formation of Buryat identity and the role of Buddhism in this process. Materials. The work investigates the collection of rare photographs at the Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies (Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences) and photographs of the ritual complex ‘khoimor-gungurba’ collected during expeditions of the 1950-1970s and in the early 21st century. Results. A method (metalanguage) of describing Buddhist photo images was developed during preliminary works to clarify the mechanism of actualizing this material in Buddhist discourse, including elements as follows: a mechanism of image selection; cultural context; ritual and social goals; nature of materials; registration of believers’ reactions to visual images. The paper shows a close relationship between the local visual practice of Buddhists and the formation of Buryat identity from the late 19th towards the 21st century, which is concluded from a comparative analysis of the two databases. After a comparative reconstruction of the structures of the collections, the work argues that the everyday ritual practice of praying before these photos is an important aspect in the formation of local identity. The most interesting finding of the study is that pre-revolutionary images of Buryat Lamas are central in the culture of the photo-visual practices of Buryat Buddhists nowadays. The comparative analysis confirmed that a fundamental change in the transmission of the Buddhist tradition in Buryatia, social changes, and the economic situation led to a change in the development of the traditional Buddhist culture of the Buryats that currently prioritizes autocephaly and the preservation of ethnic identity.

About the Author

Andrei A.  Bazarov
Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies, Siberian Branch of the RAS, (6, Sakhyanova St., Ulan-Ude 670047, Russian Federation); Buryat State University (24A, Smolin St., Ulan-Ude 670000, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Dr. Sc. (Philosophy), Leading Research Associate, Professor



References

1. Amgolonova D. D. Khambo Lama Itigelov’s return in the context of post-Soviet desecularization of public consciousness. Tartaria Magna. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 128-147. (In Russ.)

2. Andreev A. I. Russia and Tibet: A History of Tsarist, Soviet and Post-Soviet Policy. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University, Narthang, 2006. 464 p. (In Russ.)

3. Bakaeva E. P. Ethnic identity of the Kalmyks and confessional ties with Tibet: a case study of some little-known sources. Oriental Studies. 2019. No.5. Pp. 891–925. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22162/2619- 0990-2019-45-5-891-925

4. Bakaeva E. P. The Buddhism of Kalmyks and Oirats: rituals of offerings to the ancestral spirits and the spirits - masters of the territories (some aspects). Proceedings of the Institute of Oriental Studies of RAS. 2019. Is. 23. Pp. 39-66. (In Russ.)

5. Bogoslovsky V. A. Policy of the 13th Dalai Lama in Tibet. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies (RAS), 2002. 141 p. (In Russ.)

6. Daribazaron D. E. Nectar of Oral Instruction by Lobsang Tenpe Gyatso as a Source of Buddhist Philosophical Thought in Buryatia at the Turn of the 20th Century. Cand.Sc. (history) thesis. Ulan-Ude, 2018. 239 p. (In Russ.)

7. Edwards E. (ed.) Anthropology and Photography, 1860-1920. New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 1992. 288 p. (In Eng.)

8. Gourieva M. M. Scientific evaluation of everyday photography. Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal. 2009. No. 3(2). Pp.153-161. (In Russ.)

9. Kuzmin S. L., Oyuunchimeg J. 8th Bogdo-Gegen - the Great Khan of Mongolia. Asia and Africa Today. 2009. No. 1. Pp. 59-64. (In Russ.)

10. Lepekhov. S. Yu. B. D. Dandaron – Buddhist scholar, Tibetologist, Philosopher. Bulletin of the Buryat Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the RAS. 2012. No. 3 (7). Pp. 259-266. (In Russ.)

11. Magidov V. M. Film, Photo, and Phono Documents in the Context of Historical Knowledge. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities, 2005. 393 p. (In Russ.)

12. Natsov G. D. Materials on Lamaism in Buryatia. Part II. G. Galdanova (foreword, transl., etc.). Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Center (Sib. Branch of RAS), 1998. 187 p. (In Russ.)

13. Natsov G. D. Materials on the history and culture of the Buryats. Part I. G. Galdanova (foreword, transl., etc.). Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Center (Sib. Branch of RAS), 1995. 156 p. (In Russ.)

14. Tsyrempilov N. V. Buddhism and Empire: Buryat Buddhist Community in Russia (18th – Early 20th Century). Ulan-Ude: Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies (Sib. Branch of RAS), 2013. 338 p. (In Russ.)

15. Zhukovskaya N. L. Buddhism and shamanism as factors in the shaping of Buryat mentality. In: Religion in the History and Culture of Russia’s Mongolic Peoples. Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura, 2008. Pp. 9–37. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Bazarov A.A. Photo Images of Buryatia’s Buddhists. Mongolian Studies. 2020;12(4):824-833. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2020-4-824-833

Views: 513


ISSN 2500-1523 (Print)
ISSN 2712-8059 (Online)