‘Register of Dzungar Rifles’: or the Question of New Dzungar Recruits for the Stavropol Corps of Kalmyk Christians in State Policy, Late 1750s – Early 1760s
https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2020-4-735-751
Abstract
Introduction. The article deals with religious policies that influenced ethnoconfessional military communities in the southeast of the Russian Empire during early modern period. The work provides a first attempt to examine the resettlement of Dzungar Oirat refugees (Russ. zengortsy) from Siberia to the Volga territories and their integration into the Stavropol Kalmyk Host. Materials and Methods. The study analyzes documents of central and local institutions that specify the latter’s attitudes towards both Dzungar arrivals and, at large, irregular units of Kalmyk Christians in steppe border areas. A number of applied techniques inherent to source studies and archaeography made it possible to gain a comprehensive insight into the research materials and reveal certain ties that characterize trends of Russian policies towards the Dzungar question. Results. Clarification of the internal and external reasons to have forced the authorities to conscript Dzungars into the Stavropol Kalmyk Host, i. e. the need to strengthen the latter as a border military-and-police force right after the conflict with the Qing over South Siberian subjects was settled is provided. The paper shows the distribution and infrastructure development of the arrivals across unoccupied lands of the Stavropol Host. Special attention is paid to the biography of Noyon Norbo Danjin, a relative of Amursana who lead Dzungars to the Volga to become a Christian colonel, military judge, and advisor to the Collegium of Foreign Affairs. In terms of discussion, the work outlines the Dzungar conscription in Stavropol-on-Volga historiographically, delineates its correlation to the situation with available sources on contacts between Russia, Qing China, and nomads (Dzungars, Kazakhs). Conclusions. The paper acknowledges the collapse of the Dzungar Khanate proved an enormous geopolitical shift that forced Russia to restructure its external policies across southeastern steppe peripheries and develop its military strength, which brought Dzungar reserve units of the Stavropol Host in significant demand.
Keywords
About the Author
Andrey S. RyazhevRussian Federation
Cand. Sc. (History), Leading Research Associate
References
1. Sources
2. First Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire. St. Petersburg: Second Section of His Imperial Majesty's Own Chancellery, 1830. Vol. 17: 1765–1766. 1139 p. (In Russ.)
3. Russian-Dzungar Relations: Late 17th c. – 1760s. Documents and Extracts. Barnaul: Azbuka, 2006. 360 p. (In Russ.)
4. Volga Stavropol Kalmyks: Mid-1730s – 1850s. Documents and Materials. Vol. 1: Stavropol Kalmyk Host Mid-1730s – 1760s. Rostov-on-Don: Southern Scientific Center of RAS, 2011. 320 p. (In Russ.)
5. References
6. Anufriev K. S. Development of China’s Qing Dynasty policy in Central Asia. Tomsk State University Journal of History. 2013. No. 1 (21). Pp. 153–157. (In Russ.)
7. Bakaeva E. P., Zhukovskaya N. L. (eds.) The Kalmyks. Moscow: Nauka, 2010. 568 p. (In Russ.)
8. Bazarov B. V., Khishigzhargal G. The decay of the Mongol Empire and formation of the Qing Dynasty (17th–18th centuries). Vlast’ (The Authority). 2016. No. 9. Pp. 178–184. (In Russ.)
9. Bobrov D. S., Soboleva T. N. The state border in the Upper Ob-Irtysh area of the Russian Empire in the first half of the XVIII century. Izvestiya of Altai State University. 2015. No. 3–2 (87). Pp. 34–41. (In Russ.)
10. Boronin O. V. Double Tributariness in Siberia: 17th century – 1860s. Barnaul: Azbuka, 2002. 217 p. (In Russ.)
11. Dzhundzhuzov S. V., Lyubichankovsky S. V. Impact of the Russo-Turkish War of 1735–1739 on the construction of relations between the Russian Empire and nomadic peoples of the Southern Urals and Central Asia (based on materials from Orenburg expedition). RUDN Journal of Russian History. 2019. Vol. 18. No. 3. Pp. 494–524. (In Russ.)
12. Gombozhapov A. D. Frontier policy of the Qing Empire: peculiarities of the model of nomadic and settled statesmanship. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2016. No. 5. Pp. 161–166. (In Russ.)
13. Gombozhapov A. D. Policy of the Qing Empire in Central Asia (historiographical review). Vlast’ (The Authority). 2015. No. 6. Pp. 197–201. (In Russ.)
14. Kitinov B. U., Liu Qiang. Religion in Oirat Qing Dynasty politics. RUDN Journal of World History. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 1. Pp. 44–55. (In Russ.)
15. Kortunov A. I., Fokin A. A. Muslims in Cossack Hosts of the Urals: 16th – 19th Centuries. Ufa: Akmulla Bashkir State Pedagogical University, 2012. 113 p. (In Russ.)
16. Kuznetsov V. A. The new Trans-Kama Line and the formation of the land militia. Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2009. Vol. 11. No. 2 (28). Pp. 35–41. (In Russ.)
17. Modorov N. S. From the history of annexing Southern Altai to Russia in the middle of 50s of the XVIII century. Izvestiya of Altai State University. 2011. No.4-2 (72). Pp. 159–166. (In Russ.)
18. Moiseev V. A. Dzungar-Kazakh relations in the 17th – 18th centuries and Russia’s policy. Vestnik Evrazii. 2000. No. 2. Pp. 22–41. (In Russ.)
19. Pastukhov A. M. Qianlong’s Oirat policy. Bulletin of the Kalmyk Institute for Humanities of the RAS (Oriental Studies). 2009. No. 2. Pp. 19–29. (In Russ.)
20. Perdue P. C. China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Asia. London: The Belkhar Press of the Harvard University Press, 2005. XX, 725 p. (In Eng.)
21. Puzanov V. D. The formation and discharge service of the Cossacks of Siberia in the XVIII century. Bylye Gody. 2017. Vol. 46. No. 4. Pp. 1184–1193. (In Russ.)
22. Shishkina (Nozdrina) I. A. Problem of refugees from Dzungaria in the Russian-Chinese relations (the end of the 50s – the beginning of the 60s of the XVIII century). Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. 2014. No. 8 (46): in 2 parts. Part II. Pp. 208–210. (In Russ.)
23. Skobelev S. G. Demographic consequences of a gain of Jungaria by armies of Empire Qing. Novosibirsk State University Bulletin. 2010. Vol. 9. No. 5: Archaeology and Ethnography. Pp. 219–235. (In Russ.)
24. Umetbaev T. Sh., Dudnikova A. V. Two empires in the beginning of the battle for Central Asia (concerning some issues in Russian-Chinese relations in the 18th century after the collapse of the Dzungar Khanate). The Problems of Oriental Studies. 2015. No. 1 (67). Pp. 19–26. (In Russ.)
25. Yuferova N. S. The reasons for formation and stages of settling of the Irtysh ten verst space (the 18th – the first half of the 19th centuries). Izvestiya of Altai State University. 2017. No. 2 (94). Pp. 159–163. (In Russ.)
26. Zlatkin I. Ya. History of the Dzungar Khanate: 1635–1758. Moscow: Nauka, 1983. 332 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Ryazhev A.S. ‘Register of Dzungar Rifles’: or the Question of New Dzungar Recruits for the Stavropol Corps of Kalmyk Christians in State Policy, Late 1750s – Early 1760s. Mongolian Studies. 2020;12(4):735-751. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2020-4-735-751