Mongolia and the “Asian Issue” in British Victorian Foreign Policy
https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2025-2-198-210
Abstract
Introduction. The article examines Britain’s policy towards Mongolia in the era of Queen Victoria. Mongolia was studied in the British parliament as an object of colonial expansion in the context of the “Asian Issue”. These problems were not considered comprehensively in historiography in the context of justifying Mongolia’s expansion and its necessity for Victorian foreign policy. The invasion was not implemented by Britain, as Mongolia did not have access to the sea necessary for naval invasions and the creation of trade centers. All these problems force historians to identify the origins of the centuries-old contradictions between Britain and Mongolia, and the continuity of their foreign policy. The purpose of the study is to identify Mongolia’s place in Victorian foreign policy in the context of the “Asian Issue”. The objectives of the study include consideration of the peculiarities of Mongolia’s development in the context of the formation of British foreign policy, as well as the role of parliament and geographers in expansion plans. Materials and methods. The research is based on parliamentary documents, which are being put into scientific circulation for the first time, as well as documents of personal origin and the British press. Conclusions. Scientific and military intelligence research in Mongolia was coordinated by the parliament and Royal Geographical Society of Britain to strengthen the borders of British India, trade and opposition to Russia in Asia.
About the Authors
Olga Yu. ZhukovetsRussian Federation
Cand. Sc. (Philosophy), Associate Professor
Elena K. Sklyarovа
Russian Federation
Dr. Sc. (History), Professor
Olga N. Kamalova
Russian Federation
Cand.Sc. (Philosophy), Associate Professor
Bella M. Khadzhieva
Russian Federation
Cand. Sc. (History), Professor
References
1. Buksgevden A. The Pekin Treaty of 1860. Russian China. Essays on Russia’s Diplomatic Relations with China. Port Arthur: Novy Krai, 1902. 239 p. (In Russ.)
2. Volkova D. V., Sklyarovа E. K., Topchiy I. V., Gorbunova L. N. The Tibetan Question in British Foreign Policy, 1858–1904: Expansion Methods and Funding Sources. Oriental Studies. 2025. Vol. 18. No. 2. Pp. 297–310. (In Russ.) doi: 10.22162/2619-0990-2025-78-2-297-310
3. Golman M. I. Studying the History of Mongolia in the West of the 13th–mid-20th Centuries. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 218 p. (In Russ.)
4. Zhukovets O. Yu., Sklyarovа E. K., Gutieva M. A. ‘The Expedition to China’: Corruption and Shaping of British Pacific Policy in the Early-to-Mid Nineteenth Century. Oriental Studies. 2024. Vol. 17. No. 3. Pp. 476–488. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22162/2619-0990-2024-73-3-476-488
5. Zhytomyrsky S. V. Researcher of Mongolia and Tibet P. Kozlov. Moscow: Znanie, 1989. 192 p. (In Russ.)
6. History of Kalmykia from ancient times to the present day: in 3 vol. Vol. 1. Elista: Gerel Publishing House, 2009. 848 p.
7. Kozlov P. K. A Russian Traveler in Central Asia and the Dead City of Khara Khoto. St. Petersburg: N. Ya. Stoikova, 1911. 109 p. (In Rus.)
8. Sakovich E. G. The Infrastructure of Mongolian Studies in Great Britain and the USA. Peoples and Religions of Eurasia. 2018. No. 4(17). Pp. 65–71. (In Russ.)
9. Semenov P. P. The History of the Half-Century Activity of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society. St. Petersburg, 1896. Vol. 1. Pp. 307–326. (In Russ.)
10. Sergeev E. Y. The Big Game, 1856–1907: Myths and Realities of Russian-British Relations in Central and East Asia. Moscow: Association of Scientific Publications of the KMC, 2012. 454 p. (In Russ.)
11. Sk1yarova E. K., Maksimenko M. A. The Foreign Policy of Great Britain in the Era of Queen Victoria: Sanctions and International Relations. Rostov-on-Don, Taganrog: Southern Federal University, 2024. 161 p. (In Russ.)
12. Khanykov N. Notes on the Ethnography of Persia. E. Rassadina (trans.); V. Trubetskoy (ed.). Moscow: Nauka, 1977. 152 p. (In Russ.)
13. Barrow I. Making History, Drawing Territory: British Mapping in India, 1756–1905. New Delhi, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 212 p. (In Eng.)
14. Bruun О., Odgard О. Mongolia in Transition: Old Patterns. New Challenges. London, New York, 1996. 260 p. (In Eng.)
15. Eastwick E. B. The Gulistan or, Rose-Garden of Shekh Muslihud-Din Sadi of Shiraz. London, 1852. 355 p. (In Eng.)
16. Eastwick E. In: Encyclopædia Britannica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911. Vol. 8. 838 p. (In Eng.)
17. Forsyth T. D. Report of a Mission to Yarkund in 1873, Under Command of Sir T. D. Forsyth: with Historical and Geographical Information Regarding the Possessions of the Ameer of Yarkund. Calcutta: Foreign Department Press, 1875. 573 p. (In Eng.)
18. Hansard's Parliamentary Debates. 1873. 3-rd Series. 22 April. Vol. 215. Рр. 818–877. (2071 columns). (In Eng.)
19. Hopkirk P. The Great Game: on Secret Service in High Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 562 p. (In Eng.)
20. Murchison R. Address to the Royal Geographical Society. Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society of London. 1870. Vol. 14. No. 4. Pp. 287–332. (In Eng.)
21. Notes. Popular Science Monthly. 1889. No. 34. Pp. 431–432. (In Eng.)
22. Rapson E. J. Forsyth, Thomas Douglas. Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1900. Vol. 20. Pp. 33–34. (In Eng.)
23. The Economist. 1865. Pp. 675–676. (In Eng.)
Review
For citations:
Zhukovets O., Sklyarovа E., Kamalova O., Khadzhieva B. Mongolia and the “Asian Issue” in British Victorian Foreign Policy. Mongolian Studies. 2025;17(2):198-210. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2025-2-198-210



































