Preview

Mongolian Studies

Advanced search

Armenian-Mongolian Relations Based on Epigraphic Monuments of the Eastern Provinces of Armenia

https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2025-1-21-31

Abstract

Abstract. Introduction. In the early 13th century, the eastern provinces of Armenia were divided into small principalities that were politically subordinate to the Zakarids. However, with the onset of the Mongol invasions, the situation changed significantly not only in Armenia but throughout the entire region. The aim of this article is to analyze the epigraphic inscriptions preserved in the eastern provinces of Armenia in order to highlight the following key aspects: the fundamental transformations that occurred in the socio-political life of eastern Armenia following the Mongol conquests; the specific nature of the relationships between Armenian princely houses and the official representatives of the Mongol Empire; and particular aspects of the activities of Mongol khans, governors, and other officials operating in the region in direct contact with Armenian nobility. Materials and methods. The primary sources for this research include predominantly epigraphic inscriptions dating to the 13th century, originating from the eastern provinces of Armenia, as well as the accounts of Armenian historians of the same period. The study was carried out using special historical methods, primarily historical comparative analysis. A critical approach was applied to the sources, involving comparison, clarification, and interpretation of various facts. Results. Epigraphic inscriptions from the 13th century and contemporary Armenian historical narratives confirm that from 1220 to the 1270s, the Mongols conquered the territories of states existing in Georgia, Caucasian Albania, Armenia, Iran, Mesopotamia, and across vast areas of Asia Minor. The princes of eastern Armenia—particularly those of Lower and Upper Khachen — acknowledged the Mongol Empire's supremacy, recognizing the futility of resistance and seeking to preserve their domains from total destruction. Through collaboration with the Mongols, they managed to maintain their authority. Armenian princes not only paid tribute but also took part in military campaigns organized by the Mongols. The materials introduced into academic circulation in this article are valuable primary sources that hold significance for both Armenian and international scholars. Their examination allows for a deeper understanding of the history of Armenian-Mongol relations in the 13th century.

About the Authors

Vahram R. Balayan
Institute of History, National Academy of Sciences of Armenia (24g, Marshal Bagramian Av., 0019 Yerevan, Republic of Armenia)
Armenia

Dr. Sc. (History), Professor, Senior Research Associate



Lernik L. Oganesyan
Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, National Academy of Sciences of Armenia (15, Charents St., 0015 Yerevan, Republic of Armenia) Yerevan State University (52, Abovyan St., 0015 Yerevan, Republic of Armenia)
Armenia

Research Associate

Lecturer



Melanya G. Balayan
Office of the Artsakh Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church (59g, Bagramyan St., 0024 Yerevan, Republic of Armenia)
Armenia

Cand. Sc. (History), Associate Professor, Head of the Office



References

1. Sources

2. Ayrivanețsi M. History of the Armenians. St. Petersburg: Lazarev Institute of Oriental Languages, 1860. 69 p. (In Arm.)

3. Grigor Vardapet Aknerțsi. History of the Tatars. Jerusalem: St. James, 1974. 80 p. (In Arm.)

4. History of the Historian Vardan Vardapet. Venice: St. Lazarus, 1862. 184 p. (In Arm.)

5. Gandzaketsi K. History of the Armenians. Yerevan: Academy of Sciences of the Armenian SSR, 1961. 426 p. (In Arm.)

6. Mesrop Mashtots Museum-Institute of Ancient Manuscripts (Yerevan, Armenia).

7. History of the Sisakan Region, written by Archbishop of Syunik Stepanos Orbelian. Tiflis: N. Aghanyan, 1910. 494 p. (In Arm.)

8. Corpus of Armenian Inscriptions. Vol. 5. by S. Barkhudaryan (comp.). Yerevan: Academy of Sciences of the Armenian SSR, 1982. 348 p. (In Arm.)

9. References

10. Barkhutaryants M. Artsakh. Baku: Aror, 1895. 461 p. (In Arm.)

11. Dadyan Kh. Vardapet. Artsakh. Research by Bishop Makar Barkhutaryants. Ararat. 1895. No. 2. Baku: Tipografiya Svyatogo Etchmiadzina, 1896. Pp. 80–81. (In Arm.)

12. Jalalyants S. Journey through Greater Armenia. P. 2. Tiflis: Tipografiya Armyanskoj Duhovnoj Shkoly Nersisyan, 1858. 517  . (In Arm.)

13. History of the Armenians. Vol. 2. Book 2. Yerevan: Zangak, 2014. 800 p., 24 ill. (In Arm.)

14. Karapetyan S. Northern Artsakh. Yerevan: Nauka, 2004. 616 p. (In Arm.)

15. Karapetyan S. Mravavank. Yerevan: Armenian Architecture Research Foundation, 2019. 480 p. (In Arm.)

16. Catholicos Garegin I Hovsepyan. Khaghbakyan or Proshyan in Armenian History. Lebanon, Antelias, 1969. 425 p. (In Arm.)

17. Smbateyants Archbishop Mesrop. Report on the Gegharkunik-Tsovazard Region. Now the New Bayazet District, from 1862 to 1895. Vagharshapat: Tipografiya Svyatogo Etchmiadzina, 1895. 844 p. (In Arm.)

18. Shakhkhatunyants H. Signature of the Catholic of Etchmiadzin and the Five Provinces of Ararat. Vol. 2. Etchmiadzin: Tipografiya Svyatogo Etchmiadzina, 1842. 561 p. (In Arm.)


Review

For citations:


Balayan V.R., Oganesyan L.L., Balayan M.G. Armenian-Mongolian Relations Based on Epigraphic Monuments of the Eastern Provinces of Armenia. Mongolian Studies. 2025;17(1):21-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2025-1-21-31

Views: 12


ISSN 2500-1523 (Print)
ISSN 2712-8059 (Online)