Subregional System “Russia – Mongolia – China”: Transport and Сultural-Сivilizational Dimensions
https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2024-3-447-460
Abstract
Introduction. This article analyzes the subregional system “Russia –Mongolia – China”, the nature of a number of its internal processes and the features of the contextual conditions that determine it. The study is focused on determining the current conditions of its functioning and development in the transport and infrastructure sector, as well as the features of its internal intercivilizational dialogue. The main objective was to study the key conditions and factors of an economic and civilizational nature for a deeper and multidimensional understanding of the specifics of this subregional system. An equally important objective of this study is to attempt to formulate a model of incorporation of such different dimensions and planes as civilizational interactions and partnership in the field of transport infrastructure into the development of subregional issues in the research discourse. Materials and methods. The work involved monographs and analytical articles by domestic and Mongolian specialists and experts, transcripts of official negotiations at the highest level, statistical data, and media materials. A systems approach was used to the subject of the study, which was presented as a subregional system, and its research synthesis was carried out with a civilizational approach, which determined the allocation of the civilizational level as one of the dimensions of this system. Based on the results of the study, the following results were achieved. Firstly, the current state of the subregional discussion regarding the implementation of promising trilateral transport and infrastructure projects was determined, the main risks and opportunities were weighed. Secondly, the article characterizes the civilizational environment of international relations in the subregion, highlights the main vectors of its influence on the processes currently taking place between Russia, Mongolia and China in the field of international trade, transport and infrastructure construction. A conclusion is made about the positive influence of the features of the inter-civilizational dialogue in the “triangle” on the promotion of significant subregional initiatives.
About the Authors
Sergey G. LuzyaninRussian Federation
Dr. Sc. (History), Professor
Boris Kh. Kushkhov
Russian Federation
Postgraduate student
Researcher
References
1. Babaev K. V., Luzyanin S. G. Turn to the East: Russia’s East Asian Vector (2014–2024). Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024. 256 p. (In Russ.)
2. Beidina T. E., Litovchenko A. P., Novikova A. V. Transport Communications as a Tool for Implementing Mongolia’s Domestic and Foreign Policy. Bulletin of the Transbaikal State University. 2021. No. 10. Pp. 35–44. (In Russ.)
3. Dondokov Z. B.-D., Namzhilova V. O. China-Mongolia-Russia Economic Corridor: Building Infrastructure Connectivity in the Context of Global Challenges. ECO. 2022. No. 12 (582). Pp. 52–71. (In Russ.)
4. Dremov I. I., Koltsov P. M., Imeev V. O. Kalmaks and Cossacks in the Document of 1614. Bulletin of Kalmyk University. 2016. No. 4 (32). Pp. 21–27. (In Russ.)
5. Huntington S. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996. 410 p. (In Eng.)
6. Khangai L. Ediin Zasgiin Corridor Bol Orchin Tsagiin Tsayny Zam. The Economic Corridor is a Modern Tea Route. Ulaanbaatar: Munkh Useg, 2011. 148 p. (In Mong.)
7. Kulikov E. A. “The Legacy of Genghis Khan” as an Asian Factor in the Formation of the Political and Legal Doctrine of Eurasianism. Russian-Asian Legal Journal. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 49–54. (In Russ.)
8. Luzyanin S. G. Russia-Mongolia-China: Historical and Modern Transformations. Vostok. Afro-Asian Societies: History and Modernity. 2021. No. 5. Pp. 141–152. (In Russ.)
9. Makarov A. V., Makarova E. V., Andreev A. B. Mongolian Corridor: Problems and Prospects for the Development of Mongolia’s Transit and Transport Network. ECO. 2020. No. 10 (556). Pp. 34–49. (In Russ.)
10. Mironova M. N. Modern Trends of Mongolia’s Economic Cooperation with China and Russia. Bulletin of Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences. 2016. No. 3–1. 17 p. (In Russ.)
11. Myasnikov V. S. The Kastal Key of a Sinologist. In 7 vol. Moscow: Nauka, 2014. (In Russ.)
12. Myasnikov V. S. The Qing Empire and the Russian State in the 17th Century. Vol. 1. Kastalsky Key of Sinology. In 7 volumes. Moscow: Nauka, 2014. Pp. 59–74. (In Russ.)
13. Russian-Mongolian Cooperation in Multilateral Infrastructure Formats. 100 Years of Diplomatic Relations between Russia and Mongolia: from Friendly Relations to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership. V. Grayvoronsky, K. Orlova (eds.) Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies (RAS), 2022. 218 p. (In Russ.)
14. The History of China from Ancient Times to the Beginning of the 21st Century. In 10 Vols. S. Tikhvinsky (ed.). Vol. 6. The Qing Dynasty (1644-1911). O. Nepomnin (ed.) Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow: Nauka, 2014. Pp. 550–572. (In Russ.)
15. Uspensky V. L. From the History of Russian-Chinese Relations in the 17th Century: based on New Documents in the Mongolian Language. New Historical Bulletin. 2012. No. 33. Pp. 10–16. (In Russ.)
16. Wang Ping. Russian-Chinese-Mongolian Cross-Border Area as a Space for Intercultural Dialogue. Humanitarian vector. Series: Philosophy, Cultural Studies. 2015. No. 2 (42). Pp. 67–74. (In Russ.)
17. Zheleznyakov A. S. Mongolian Civilization: History and Modernity. Theoretical Substantiation of the Atlas. Moscow: Ves’ Mir, 2016. 288 p. (In Russ.)
18. Zheleznyakov A. S., Chuluunbaatar G. Russia and Mongolia in the civilizational and geopolitical paradigms of the development of Central Eurasia. Peoples' Friendship University of Russia Journal. Series: Sociology. 2023. No. 3. Pp. 612–621. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Luzyanin S.G., Kushkhov B.Kh. Subregional System “Russia – Mongolia – China”: Transport and Сultural-Сivilizational Dimensions. Mongolian Studies. 2024;16(3):447-460. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2024-3-447-460