Preview

Mongolian Studies

Advanced search

Transformation of Mongolia’s Traditional Nomadic Society: The Modernization Trend Analyzed

https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2022-3-566-577

Abstract

Introduction. Transformation of a nomadic society is a multifaceted process. The social organization and inner structure of Mongolia’s nomadic society have undergone cardinal changes of the 20th century — only to experience various impulses of further development. Goals. The article aims to reveal the inner substantial side inherent to the transformation process within contemporary Mongolia’s nomadic society. The paper considers the social system of nomads as a self-organizing one that adapts to new market conditions and commodity-money relations to regenerate the institutions of traditional society, strengthen new social orders, and create advanced forms of social alliances and interactions. Materials. The work analyzes literary and field materials for insights into the phenomena of transformation in economic, social and cultural spheres of Mongolia’s nomads. Results. The study shows nomadic households are being gradually involved into market relations to be incorporated in the general division of labor system; defines functions of a contemporary nomadic community, such as protection of pastures in use, sharing of water and other natural resources, etc. Conclusions. The study delineates key characteristics inherent to the observed transformation of nomadic society, namely: commodification and individualization of nomadic livestock breeding and, as a consequence, rationalization of economic behavior, preservation of a mobile (migratory) lifestyle to be accompanied by fixation of nomadic boundaries and distinct localization of seasonal camps, replacement of traditional values by market ones. It is emphasized that kinship ties are being gradually replaced by territorial ones when it comes to identify borders of present-day nomadic social groups. The emergence of a territorial community attests to the overcoming of conservative features typical of nomadic society once largely based on family ties, tribal background, etc. 

About the Authors

Alexandr D. Gombozhapov
Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies, Siberian Branch of the RAS (6, Sakhyanova St., 670047 Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (History), Leading Research Associate 



Valentina G. Zhalsanova
Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies, Siberian Branch of the RAS (6, Sakhyanova St., 670047 Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sc. (Sociology), Senior Research Associate 



References

1. Badaraev D. D., Breslavsky A. S., Gombozhapov A. D., Zhambalova S. G., Tsybenov B. D. Nomadism and Migrations in Contemporary Mongolia. Ulan-Ude: Buryat Scientific Center (SB RAS), 2017. 168 p. (In Russ.)

2. Barcus H. R. Contested space, contested livelihoods: A review of Mongolia pastureland management and land-tenure reform. Geographical Review. 2018. Vol. 108. No. 1. Pp. 138–157. (In Eng.)

3. Bazarov B. V. Transformation of Nomadic Society: Comparative Analysis of Social and Economic Development of Mongolian Peoples at the End of XX – Beginning of XXI Centuries. Nomadic Civilizations in Cross Cultural Dialogue . Ulaanbaatar, 2011. Pp. 436–439. (In Eng.)

4. Bold B.-O. Socio-economic segmentation: Khot-ail in nomadic livestock keeping of Mongolia. Nomadic Peoples. 1996. No. 39. Pp. 69–86. (In Eng.)

5. Golenkova Z. T. Main tendencies of transformation of social structure in the modern Russian society. RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2001. No. 1. Pp. 28–43. (In Russ.)

6. Gombozhapov A. D. Social organization of the Mongolian nomad community in XXI century: Role of family ties. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 211–223. (In Russ.)

7. Gorokhova G. S. Essays on Mongolia’s History: The Era of Manchu Rule. Moscow: Nauka — GRVL, 1980. 132 p. (In Russ.)

8. Graivoronsky V. V. From Nomadism to Sedentarization: A Case Study of the Mongolian People’s Republic. Moscow: Nauka, 1979. 179 p. (In Russ.)

9. Graivoronsky V. V. Social Reforms in Contemporary Mongolia. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies (RAS), 2007. 256 p. (In Russ.)

10. Haas H., Fransen S., Natter K., Schewel K., Vezzoli S. Social transformation. International Migratiom Unstitute (IMI) Working Paper Series. 2020. No. 166. Pp. 2–45. (In Eng.)

11. Humphrey C. Pastoral nomadism in Mongolia: The role of herdsmen’s cooperatives in the national economy. Development and Change. 1978. Vol. 9. No. 1. Pp. 133–160. (In Eng.)

12. Humphrey C., Sneath D. The End of Nomadism?: Society, State, and the Environment in Inner Asia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999. 368 p. (In Eng.)

13. Jagvaral N. Arats and Their Economy. Ulaanbaatar: MPR Academy of Sciences, 1974. 222 p. (In Russ.)

14. Janzen J. Changes in the Mongolia pastoral economy during the transformation period. Nomadic Studies. 2009. No. 16. Pp. 7–16. (In Eng.)

15. Janzen J. Mobile livestock-keeping in Mongolia: Present problems, spatial organization, interactions between mobile and sedentary population groups, and perspectives for pastoral development. In: Ikeya K., Fratkin E. (eds.) Pastoralist and Their Neighbors in Asia and Africa. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 2005. Pp. 69–98. (In Eng.)

16. Khazanov A. M. Nomads and the External World. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University (Faculty of Philology), 2008. 512 p. (In Russ.)

17. Kradin N. N. The transformations of pastoral economy in Tuva and Zabaikalie region at the turn of the 20th-21st centuries. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 2016. No. 2. Pp. 8–27. (In Russ.)

18. Kradin N. N., Yankov A. G. Transformation processes in stock-raising of Buryat-Mongol bedouins at the turn of XX-XXI centuries. Vestnik RGNF. 2006. No. 4. Pp. 177–186. (In Russ.)

19. Lapin N. I. The issue of sociocultural transformation approached. Voprosy filosofii. 2000. No. 6. Pp. 3–33. (In Russ.)

20. Marin A. Between cash cows and golden calves: adaptations of Mongolian pastoralism in the ‘age of the market’. Nomadic Peoples. 2008. Vol. 12. No. 2. Pp. 75–101. (In Eng.)

21. Masanov N. E. Kazakh Nomadic Civilization: Life Sustenance Essentials of Nomadic Society. Almaty, Moscow: Sotsinvest, Gorizont, 1995. 320 p. (In Russ.)

22. Polanyi K. The Great Transformation: Origins of Our Time. St. Petersburg: Aletheia, 2002. 320 p. (In Russ.)

23. Simukov A. D. Works on Mongolia and for Mongolia. Vol. 2. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 2007. 635 p. (In Russ.)

24. Sneath D. Land use, the environment and development in post-socialist Mongolia. Oxford Development Studies. 2003. Vol. 31. No. 4. Pp. 441–459. (In Russ.)

25. Tönnies F. Community and Society (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft). Moscow: Universitet; St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal, 2002. 450 p. (In Russ.)

26. Tserenkhand G. The Mongolian Economy: Studies in Ethnology and Culture. Collected papers. Ulaanbaatar: Admon-Print, 2015. 572 p. (In Russ.)

27. Yadov V. A. Post-Soviet societies transformations: what is more significant – the historically traditional or recent past? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya (Sociological Studies). 2014. No. 7. Pp. 47–50. (In Russ.)

28. Yaskina G. S. (ed.) History of Mongolia: 20th Century. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies (RAS), 2007. 448 p. (In Russ.)

29. Zaslavskaya T. I. Contemporary Russian Society: Social Mechanism of Transformation. Moscow: Delo, 2004. 400 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Gombozhapov A.D., Zhalsanova V.G. Transformation of Mongolia’s Traditional Nomadic Society: The Modernization Trend Analyzed. Mongolian Studies. 2022;14(3):566-577. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2022-3-566-577

Views: 386


ISSN 2500-1523 (Print)
ISSN 2712-8059 (Online)